Sony’s 24-105mm f4 isn’t that well built in our opinion, but Canon’s 24-105mm and 24-70mm f2.8 lenses are incredibly solid. Sigma’s are also very well built overall, though the 24-70mm f2
This is a Lens REVIEW of the Canon RF 70-200 f4 IS, against Canon’s RF 70-200 f2.8. I took both of these out to photograph Ice Hockey which is one of the hardest things in my opinion to shoot. If a lens can handle ice hockey, it can handle anything. The question is, should you go with the f4 or the 2.8?
Posted February 15, 2016. I think the 24-70 is more useful for most people and it is not very big as far as these f2.8 lenses go. However, the 16-35mm f4 is really good, and I think I would find for general wandering about taking photos a 16-35 + 50mm + 70+mm lens would work very nicely instead of a 24-70 + 70+mm.
dUK7. zkdv2rgw4i.pages.dev/132zkdv2rgw4i.pages.dev/402zkdv2rgw4i.pages.dev/324zkdv2rgw4i.pages.dev/359zkdv2rgw4i.pages.dev/569zkdv2rgw4i.pages.dev/345zkdv2rgw4i.pages.dev/197zkdv2rgw4i.pages.dev/311
canon 24 70 f4 vs f2 8
